The reason being that there isn't a real need to merge it as it perfectly descripts the the topic clearly imho, plus it nails the name right on the dot. All in all I disagree with the merging.
1,779
pages
ALL POSTS
Thanks for bringing this up. There are two pages that discuss the same location, so best practice would generally be to merge one of them with the other. We can of course preserve the information on both pages, but avoiding unnecessary duplication is a good thing.
(Edited by Atvelonis)
It's just that I recall the former page being there before the latest one with a longer title, and I don't really see a reason to merge them when the former perfectly explains it already is all.
Well, we can look into it. One of them will be merged at some point, but I can assure you that the content will not be deleted if it's valuable.